The River Knows
How Water and Land Will Shape Our Future
Retired Drake University Law Professor Neil Hamilton wants Iowans to take a long, hard look at what we’ve done . . . and what we’re doing to our state.
“ . . . . something has changed in Iowa and not for the better,” laments Iowa native Neil Hamilton, who grew up on an Adams County farm and spent his career at Drake University as a law professor focused on food and agriculture.
Hamilton analyzes those changes in “The River Knows: How Water Will Shape Our Future,” a sequel to his 2022 book, “The Land Remains.” In both books, Hamilton lays the blame for the damaging changes squarely at the feet of industrial agriculture. The politics and policies of agribusiness have transformed Iowa, he said.
In making the case, Hamilton is assisted by narrative from “The River,” who has endured countless “injuries and insults” while trying to remain “hopeful and resilient.” The River urges the reader to “get out on the river” to consider its role in providing “natural beauty, a place to rest, a home for nature” and more.
But Hamilton, whom The River dubs “The Professor,” doesn’t pull punches when describing many Iowans’ lack of respect for our land and water. “If the discussion offends you,” Hamilton says, “the offense may be well intended.”
For example:
“The long history of the Iowa Farm Bureau’s efforts to deny, deflect, delay and even deceive the public concerning agriculture’s impact on the environment has had great success,” Hamilton asserts. The farm group, which Hamilton describes as “an appendage to a powerful financial insurance company,” has opposed almost all environmental regulations.
He points to the farm organization’s contentions that farmers voluntarily use practices that protect soil and water, while data actually show that our rivers and streams continue to be impaired.
Who’s to blame? Big Ag defenders say we must produce all we can to “feed and fuel the world.” But Hamilton doesn’t accept that excuse.
“We are happy to say it is just the ‘system’ that is the problem, not the actions of the individuals,” Hamilton writes. “The reality is we privilege the right of any farmer or landowner to farm their land however they choose, over any idea of responsibility to the public.”
Hamilton said the industrialization of agriculture, with a focus on all-out production, has forced farmers into a system of dependence on outside inputs from big business. Thus, USDA farm programs and subsidies to farmers end up funneling money back to the international agribusinesses “who stand on the shoulders (and necks) of America’s farm families.”
Public relations campaigns by agricultural groups may revere those farmers with almost religious fervor, Hamilton said. “(I)t is a message of Agri-Nationalism that basically says farmers are always right, regulations are always bad, and the public must support agriculture at all costs.”
Even farmers themselves may be reluctant to criticize the unsustainable operations or activities of their neighbors, Hamilton notes. “It is just as hard in farm country to admit some farm practice is bad as it is to admit you are an atheist or agnostic.”
Much of Hamilton’s “intended offense” is directed at Republicans – but he does not spare the Democrats, whom he said should have been developing new leaders to follow former Senator Tom Harkin and former Governor Tom Vilsack. And the Biden administration’s climate initiatives, lacking the necessary agricultural regulations or funding, “may largely be another exercise in self-delusion.”
Inaccurate public perceptions – “opinions Iowans have convinced ourselves of that may not be true” – compound the lack of understanding of the problem, Hamilton declares.
Examples:
“Ethanol is a green fuel.” But not if growing the corn to produce it pollutes the water, erodes the soil, uses fossil fuels, and converts marginal land to crops.
“Soil erosion is not a major concern for Iowa.” Topsoil does NOT renew itself at the rate of 5 tons per acre per year, despite that common mantra.
“The land can absorb and handle the amounts of manure applied.” Animal waste often washes off the land or leaches into tile lines.
“Farmers do not use any more fertilizer or nitrogen than is necessary.” Many farmers consider nitrogen an insurance policy, so apply more than agronomists recommend.
The River questions whether state officials value or know about clean water, as demonstrated by the defunding of the IOWATER program that once provided training for people to monitor local water quality. “I guess the theory was why do we want people looking when we know what they will find is bad news,” The River observes cynically. “They might start asking questions.”
On a positive note, The River suggests an option to conservatives who may oppose regulations requiring conservation measures. Why not give landlords tax credits if their farm lease requires the tenant or operator to plant cover crops?
In his hope that nature might help heal the divide between political opposition to land protection and the public’s desire for more recreational areas, trails, and open spaces, Hamilton longs for “Ding Darling Republicans, the outdoors people and nature lovers.” He has planned a two-day Iowa Nature Summit Nov. 16-17 to bring together organizations, individuals, educators, students, government agencies, adults and youths to “set a plan for the future, a plan underpinned by concrete commitments of action . . .”
Yes, many in the industrial agriculture community will take offense at Hamilton’s writing. But perhaps they’ll be more open to suggestions from The River:
“First, Iowa needs clearer thinking,” rather than the “domination” mindset of our relationship with the lands and waters.
“Second, Iowa needs more imagination and bigger ideas” to break out of the “century long infatuation” with growing corn and soybeans.
“. . .you could weave a whole new set of nature-based economic activities into your rural agricultural structure, if you had the vision,” The River counsels.
Also, “you need to quit fooling yourself with false claims of progress and consider the realities of what is happening to the land and water.”
Sage advice from The River tempers Hamilton’s sharp, yet insightful critiques of how badly we’re treating our rivers (and our land.) The River Knows . . . that Iowans need to collaborate and cooperate to restore the water quality our grandchildren’s future depends on.
The River Knows: How Water and Land Will Shape Our Future | Neil Hamilton | 9781948509442 | 276 trade paper | $24.95
Steve Semken, Publisher, Ice Cube Press, LLC | Since 1991www.icecubepress.com | Iowa Governor's Art Award 2023
So how did I get here, given my overflowing “to-do” list? Well, the Iowa Writers’ Collaborative has reconnected me with several old friends from my 25 years as outdoor water/photographer with the Des Moines Register from 1972 to 1997. Plus the group has helped me discover the talents and insights of a new (to me) set of writers. I‘m looking forward to sharing my Iowa roots, memories, observations, frustrations, and joys with those folks - and with readers.
I come at this endeavor as an Iowa farm kid who has never outgrown playing in the “crick.” I believe that every kid should have that same opportunity to go outside and get muddy. And I can easily wax nostalgic about the wild places we have lost in my seven-plus decades on this planet. For more about where those times, people, and adventures have led me, here’s a link to my website.
If you’re interested in commentary by some of Iowa’s best writers, please follow your choice of Iowa Writers’ Collaborative members:
With much respect for what the "River" has to say, I would doubt that Vilsack or Harkin were any better at proposing better legislation beyond something "symbolic". Vilsack believes everything ISU ever told him, and since corporate giants fund many of the chairs there and build buildings for the institution, what possible impact does that have! Biden sees CO2 pipelines as a savior of the oil industry and currently is promoting them, never mind how dangerous they are to Iowan's and the fact that the end result of these pipe lines is the production of even more greenhouse gas. Other countries use the CO2 generated in greenhouses where the plants can use it to grow and create oxygen, a much more sensible approach that takes no high pressure pipelines that will destry good Iowa crop land and the possibility of killing many Iowan's in te process.